Talk:Merger (politics)

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unnecessary paragraph?

Is the following paragraph really relevant to the political definition of amalgamation? "Amalgamation may also be used to describe the combination of several actual cities into one within works of fiction, often evidenced by the sight of several landmarks that in real life wouldn't be found in the same city. This is usually seen in films shot in several cities, generally with the purpose of not locating the fictional city in which the action takes place as an existing locaiton(sic)."

Propose that this be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.173.208.215 (talk) 15:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I disagree. This paragraph not only demonstrates what the political process of amalgamation entails; it demonstrates how an ad-hoc, "unofficial" form of combination can happen when different cities - political units - are combined for dramatic effect. --Edwin Herdman 04:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates a lot of annexation

Doesn't it? Kevlar67 00:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The processes are similar, but notably distinct. Amalgamation is a term used in political science to denote the combination of two areas into one within the same legal system; Annexation has one area swallowing up another, usually sovereign. --Edwin Herdman 03:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong tack?

Here is an article which makes use of one major definition of the term as used in political studies - intermarriage between ethnic groups that creates a joined society, i.e. the "melting pot." I think this probably merits inclusion in the article. --Edwin Herdman 04:16, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merger (politics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105084333/http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/english/on-line-exhibits/maps/currentrestructure.aspx to http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/english/on-line-exhibits/maps/currentrestructure.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]