Talk:Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	Kentucky portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Kentucky.
	Kentucky portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Louisville.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

This redirect is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles

Law

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

needs major rewrite

There are way too many details about the lower court actions while there isn't enough info about the supreme court opinions themselves. In addition, should the Seatle case be merged into this one? Jon 17:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, people have to get through the 185-page opinion document. I've only read through less than a dozen pages, myself. A lot of the Court opinions are based on what the news and attorneys have reported and what is in those first few pages. The attorneys involved haven't even finished reading the opinion. --Carl ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- this article should be merged with Parents v. Seattle, which was the leading case, not this one.

<<Coburn_Pharr>> 04:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support In addition the other one is much better written. Jon 18:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think they should each have their own article, as they are separate cases that just happened to be decided together. The story behind the JCPS case cannot be allowed to be buried. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 15:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Merge. Come on folks, the two cases were merged by the Supreme Court. There's only one SCOTUS opinion, and only one SCOTUS citation: 127 S. Ct . 2738.Ferrylodge (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chiming in only... four or five years later, I've now redirected this page to Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1. I tried fixing some of the issues in this article, but it became clear very quickly that the answer here is to combine into one article. The cases were consolidated and Parents Involved took the top spot. If there are parts of this article that can be merged in to the main article, feel free. But having two separate articles simply doesn't make sense. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Facts of the Case needs cleanup

There are many cut-and paste errors in this section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.73 (talk) 20:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]