Talk:Mercedes-Benz Citaro

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buses Mid‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chariots of Fire

This page is currently linked to from the Chariots of Fire (disambiguation) dab page with the entry "Chariots of Fire - a nickname for Mercedes Benz Citaro articulated buses in London". I am not certain whether it should be included on that page or not, and so have started a discussion at Talk:Chariots of Fire (disambiguation). Please comment there rather than here. Thryduulf (talk) 13:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

fire in Citaro busses (Germany, Italy)

German article: https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article176508832/Busbraende-Warum-Citaros-von-Mercedes-in-Rom-brennen.html

File:Bucharest Citaro bus 3.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Bucharest Citaro bus 3.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Bucharest Citaro bus 3.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery removals

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hello, I have made some changes. Per WP:NOTAGALLERY, you can't just have excessive images. Its a lot of work and User:Sjeintspen does not want anyone breaking policy, so blame him as I completely hate this policy but i will follow to avoid getting blocked. --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 09:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Pinging Davey2010 and Sjeintspen concerning the gallery issue that Davey2010 is doing. I'm at breaking point and do not want to edit anymore. Davey's version with heaps of violations, my [1] which is cleaner. Please choose which is better as if Davey's is better. I'm retiring. --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 15:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there are too many images but I'm not the best way to go about it - I'll work on it this evening and see what you think tomorrow, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Send a draft copy... as said User:Sjeintspen doesn't like galleries, but by all means I have no problems if you want to replace them. Half the photos are not bad (except the Citaro BlueTec which is so bad as a person is in the way). But in hindsight, I did not do any image replacements except the Citaro blueTec, so stop accusing me of doing things which were out of my control as I want to follow all WP policies like WP:NOTAGALLERY. You can't just excuse your bad habits for a direct violation of the policy. Be mindful this revert was due to excessive images and it was fine as WP:STACK applies and I want to respect the policies and guidelines where possible. Basically if I make an edit, instead of reverting me, by all means find new images and replace them. The selfie article at the moment is littered with utter crap and the portrait shot is skewing the widescreen laptop which is the sole reason and the article is a literal dog's breakfast hence my tedious editing because I am a stickler for cleaning up and I want to promote the article to a WP:GA which you are stopping me from doing. It can help me at one point being an admin but i hardly say no to that --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 16:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A road being shut off meaning buses cannot reach bus stops - that's out of the bus companies control. Unnecessarily replacing images for no apparent reason - that's entirely in your control.

Meh in all fairness NOTGALLERY is not something I ever remember to the point where if you didn't mention it here I wouldn't even know what the guideline page is called!. I appreciate articles look different on different devices but as far as I'm aware thumbsizes look fine on all devices...

The selfie article is fine and either way that's unrelated to this article. Okay cool good luck with that. –Davey2010^Talk 16:33, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was great you made that WP:RFC for the selfie article, but you need to learn that everyone wants to get images to QI. You are a biased person who prefers to bully me because of my race. I think you should just mind your own business and let users do what they want. I'd appreciate it if you stop reverting me for no apparent reason before I start leaving Wikipedia for good and not looking back and smashing my laptop to erase evidence. Oshwah advised me not to edit the article any further and I respected his advice. But in hindsight I hate you, you suck and I think you can honestly get a life off Wikipedia that's more productive. Its Wiki-Pedia not Daveypedia you Karen --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 16:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable. I have never in my entire life reverted someone based on their race never!, I don't even know what you look like nor do I even care. That's an utterly disgraceful comment to make. –Davey2010^Talk 17:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi, I've removed a whole ton of images which were cluttering up the page, I've kept some such as both images of the CapaCity as I felt a door-side image was helpful as was the non-door side (one shows the doors, the other in better quality shows the length),
I have however moved the Czech bus image to the Portugal section as to be honest I couldn't find a good spot for it (no Czech section exists) however I believed it was too unique to be removed entirely
There were some good image verities (such as the GU and L models) but again no space to put them anywhere and didn't feel it was helpful to add a gallery at the bottom, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

eCitaro

Given the different design and drivetrain of the eCitaro - should a new article be created? Mercedes Benz consider it a new model of bus rather than an evolution/model type of the Citaro (e.g. the CapaCity & CapaCity L) Turini2 (talk) 12:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]