Talk:Memoria

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Past tense

Everything on this page is in past tense. I've always been taught that memoria is a "past canon" in rhetoric because we tend to avoid memorizing speeches through various methods like teleprompters, iPads, notecards, etc...; but the other history of rhetoric pages are in present tense and I don't see a source cited to justify this. Thoughts?Countercharm (talk) 01:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

The first sentence of the section headed "Memoria in the Renaissance" makes no sense to me... "When the Humanists took up the ideas on memory found the writings of Classical authors, memoria played an important role in the pedagogical system."

Off topic

I have moved this from the article, because is totally off topic:

Memoria On The Web This is also a forum on the internet that is based around final fantasy. The web address is here. It is a game based community offering up to date news about Final Fantasy, Grandia and Kingdom Hearts. The forums on the web are home to members who like these games along with many others. The site features reviews for all these games and guides and are currently looking for content writers and forum moderators.

Ehjort 16:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

if that was the case then we would have to add 'memoria' being a key lyric in 'come as you are' by nirvana, considering the fame of the song —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.251.37.25 (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

disambiguation

this page is going to need to move so we can distinguis between the current Memoria (rhetoric) and Memoria (Christian feast) which alos points to this page: "In the New Testament Paul of Tarsus organised his missionary travels around the celebration of Pentecost. (Acts 20.16 and 1 Corinthians 16.8) This practice draws from Jewish tradition, with such feasts as the Feast of Tabernacles, the Passover, and the Jubilee. Today Catholics, Eastern Christians, and traditional Protestant communities frame worship around a liturgical calendar, which consists of a set of cycles of liturgical seasons observed annually. This includes holy days, such as solemnities which commemorate an event in the life of Jesus or the saints, periods of fasting such as Lent, and other pious events such as memoria or lesser festivals commemorating saints. Some Christian groups that do not follow a liturgical tradition often retain certain celebrations, such as Christmas, Easter and Pentecost. A few churches make no use of a liturgical calendar." --Just nigel 03:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inbreeding in Europe?

Is this part really serious? Or just badly phrased?

"Ancient peoples used their memories to store large amounts of information. Today, people are far less intelligent due mainly to inbreeding and a devastating plaque virus that wiped out the intelligent classes in Europe in 1456 therefore today we use literate and electronic memory systems. Literate memory systems include books, periodicals, and libraries. Electronic systems include computers, databases, computer software, the World Wide Web, and other artificial memory devices (Crowley and Hawhee 325-28)."

It seems unlikely one should blame the plague for the existence of the Internet etc. Also, though I am far from an expert in this field, does not the discussion on when writing was becoming a threat to our ability to remember go much further back, like to Plato? Some story about how Thoth invented writing, if I remember things correctly.

I think the "memory systems" of Homer and the like were history already in Plato's time.

I wont make any changes to the page though, as, again, I am far from an expert in this field. I just wanted to point this out now that I happened to notice it (I hope I am not pointing in out in the wrong way, if so, please let me know.)

Kjell Pettersson (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Memoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080505144029/http://rhetoric.byu.edu/canons/Memory.htm to http://rhetoric.byu.edu/canons/Memory.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]