Talk:Melaleuca acacioides

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Melaleuca acacioides is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Conflicting etymological sources/misquoting source

The current Wiki-lemma states:

The ending -oides is a Latin suffix meaning "resembling" or "having the form of".^[1]^[2]

Brophy et al. state (p. 65).^[1]:

acacioides, from Acacia, a genus of Fabaceae, and the Greek -oides, resembling

Brown (1958, p. 483):

Suf. -oid, -oides, -odes, -oideus, -a, -um, like, resembling, having the form of, < Gr. -eides, like, < eidos, n. form, shape, likeness, as dendroeides, treelike; kephaloeides, headlike; limnodes, marshlike; phyllodes, leaflike.

Only the suffix -eides is labelled as Greek by Brown, not -oides. One can infer from the explanation given by Brown in which several Latin compounds are presented that end on -oides (such as Cordyloides and Dasychiroides) that Latin -oides must be the equivalent to Greek -(o)eides (or is actually the Latinized form of Greek -(o)eides). Brophy statement that -oides would be Greek is however incorrect and one can not use Brophy to source that -oides would be a Latin suffix. Wimpus (talk) 23:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No sources have been "misquoted". I hope you approve the change I have made and thank you for noticing. Gderrin (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you put Brophy as source behind "The ending -oides is a Latin suffix meaning "resembling" or "having the form of"." than it seems that Brophy is labelling -oides as Latin, while actually it is labelled as Greek in Brophy. Please notice that labelling -oides as Greek is a common error in Brophy. Wimpus (talk) 00:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ ^a ^b Brophy, Joseph J.; Craven, Lyndley A.; Doran, John C. (2013). Melaleucas : their botany, essential oils and uses (PDF). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. p. 65. ISBN 9781922137517. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
^ Brown, Roland Wilbur (1956). The Composition of Scientific Words. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. p. 483.

[Brophy-1] Brophy, Joseph J.; Craven, Lyndley A.; Doran, John C. (2013). Melaleucas : their botany, essential oils and uses (PDF). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. p. 65. ISBN 9781922137517. Retrieved 21 November 2019.

[RWB-2] Brown, Roland Wilbur (1956). The Composition of Scientific Words. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. p. 483.

[1]

[2]