Talk:Melaleuca, Inc. v. Hansen
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]First Peer Review Suggestions
A couple of substantive edits that I did not make (for fear of changing the meaning of the text beyond what the author intended):
1) It is a little unclear which opinion is being referred to in the introduction section - the text talks about the CAN-SPAM decision, but the reference is to the later opinion which seemed to be primarily about collateral estoppel
2) The significance section could be clearer about how this is building on Gordon v. Virtumundo (or is it just applying it?)
(Great job, though Lilylolo! I thought it was very informative and concise!)
Jk214 (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Idaho articles
- Low-importance Idaho articles
- WikiProject Idaho articles
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2012 Q1