Talk:Melaleuca

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Melaleuca is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Melaleuca the company redirects here

Why does the disambiguation page list it as a separate entry, but redirects back here? --66.72.39.226 (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed --Melburnian (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There used to be documentation and reference to Melaleuca, Inc. (an American company out of Idaho Falls). This company has the largest pattents and breakthroughs for products using Melaleuca oil, and since http://melaleuca.com directs there, that should be the "company" referenced in the disambiguation (where did it go!?). The page needs to be recreated, since the company has a phenomenal amount of national and international awards of excellence for various reasons. Reference-wise, Melaleuca Inc. should be second ONLY to the plant group of that name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.220.223.50 (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

404 Ref error

The following reference brings up a 404 page not found error:

Association of Societies for Growing Australian Plants - Melaleuca Page

Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 03:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: It was an external link (not a reference) and I just removed it.

Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 03:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further use

According to http://www.sydneybrushfencing.com/wp-content/uploads/Brush%20fence%20reportF.pdf a melaleuca tea tree species is cultivated as raw material for the type of brush fences used around houses etc in Australia.101.185.35.132 (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but the .com mentioned does not name any Melaleuca species and refers to "ti tree". Not an appropriate reference for a Wikipedia article. Gderrin (talk) 12:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melaleuca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141230124130/http://www.endemia.nc/plante/fiche.php?code=444 to http://www.endemia.nc/plante/fiche.php?code=444

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

Australian-born here, lived in Melbourne fifty years. The given pronunciation, /ˌmɛləˈljuːkə/, has no citation. I've never heard anyone say /ˌmɛləˈljuːkə/. I've always said /ˌmɛləˈluːkə/ (personally, closer to /ˌmæləˈluːkə/ because celery/salary merger) and a poll I ran on Mastodon agrees with me. Recommend parentheses around the /j/ at the very least, but I challenge users to find a source that has /j/ at all. 2001:8000:24EF:300F:D066:8DC6:8A9F:A637 (talk) 02:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]