Talk:Mega Man & Bass/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 22:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

It's been up for GAN for over 60 days, so let's review

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Are you sure it's supposed to read Super Nintendo when it was only released on the Super Famicom in Japan?
Done — Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Does Japan, North America and CDs really need to be wikilinked?
Done — Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
I think the retrieval date format needs to be the same as the publishing date format
Done — Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Looks alright

C. No original research:
Looks okay
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Looks fine

B. Focused:
Looks good
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
no problems here
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
no issues here
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Looks nice

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Looks great
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
~~the retrieval date format is my only major concern; I'm giving you a week, but it shoudln't take long~~ it's a pass