Talk:Medusa (Caravaggio)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CherryBlossom101.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image change

Hello. I changed the image of Uffizi Medusa in the article to match with the current view of the work after the restoration. The painting now is more colorful, especially in the green area. I saw the Medusa in 2015 at Uffizi Gallery, and this image is the closest to eye view. Also, it's the current image used in the list of Caravaggio paintings (Wiki article). The original image was too old and reflected the painting situation until the 90's. I am planning to improve the present article in the next days. As a Caravaggio amateur researcher, i have enough material to write, especially about the provenience and the correct dates. I think the two versions (Uffizi and the attributed Murtola) deserve their own sections in the article. Gcatharino (talk) 05:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I saw you're a new user but it looks like you're making some awesome Caravaggio edits. Muito obrigado! - - mathmitch7 ^{(talk/contribs)} 19:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Baroque Art

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CherryBlossom101 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rmmiller364 (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Medusa

Ttty 151.57.8.145 (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant information in 'History' section

I'm unsure why the "History" section contains so much information about Caravaggio's possible criminal exploits and the other works he produced during this time. I would have deleted it, but I'm not sure if it should be repurposed. (Is it worth adding to the article on Caravaggio?) CRYPTNYMPH (talk) 01:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]