Jump to content

Talk:Medieval Monuments in Kosovo/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Medieval Monuments in Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Albanian name is not related with the article

The site https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/724 doesnt include the albanian name. These medieval monuments in kosovo are visible, clearly and indisputable serbian orthodox And in the article says what albanians tried to destroy these monuments The Un site says "Autonomous province of Kosovo" (Kosovo and metohia) So its visible the not related albanian name need to be deleted or putted in second position, because these monuments are serbian (and even UN recognises) John L. Booth (talk) 05:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:JohnGotten.

:They're in Kosovo, where the official langauges are Albanian and Serbian. THere's no reason to prefer one over the other in order, so it might as well be alphabetic. The damage during the civil war is immaterial to this discussion. Your UNesco link doesn't include names in either language, so that's irrelevant as well.Pipsally (talk) 06:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:Orchomen. :Kosovo is not recognised in the Unesco(and it will never be), and is proved in the site, Albanian and Serbian language are official only in existing, but is not like glued, albanian mosques in kosovo will not have serbian name(because its not serbian) like the same serbian orthodox churches will not have albanian name (because its not albanian). Its not only damaged in the civil war, but too in recent albanian arrest against serbs in 2007 and 2012. The albanization name in this its like to put an nazi aryan name in a WW2 damaged synagogue in poland. The name is not in alphabetic order, its not intuitive, but yes by priority, that’s why the Serbian should come first. I am agreed the removal of both serbian and albanian name in the translation of the text "Medieval Monuments in Kosovo", or at least, the albanian name, because is not relatedJohn L. Booth (talk) 07:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:JohnGotten. :@Pipsally: Do you agree at least to the removal of both Serbian and Albanian names as they are not related with the UNESCO site? John L. Booth (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:JohnGotten. :: No, I think they should stay per established consensus on the page.Pipsally (talk) 02:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:Orchomen. :::No, was none "per established consensus on the page", only edit-warring of kosovars sockpuppets, If you continue to respond in a manipulative and malicious manner, I will call an administrator to speak about, as you prove to be a waste of time and a delay in making ethical decisions about Wikipedia policies. John L. Booth (talk) 02:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:JohnGotten.

Ad hominems remarks aren't going to help resolve this. It seems to me that three monuments are in Kosovo, where the dominant language is Albanian so that would probably guide me to listing that language first. Obviously Serbian has equal status, so if both native language translations are going to be listed alphabetical ordering seems as good as any.
Anyhow, you and I clearly aren't going to agree between ourselves, so let's wait to see what others think. Pipsally (talk) 03:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:Orchomen.

:::::: What I said is not ad hominem, but a personal overview of what is going on.

This claim that "the dominant language is Albanian, therefore, everything that is Serbian must be written in Albanian first" is malicious and ethically wrong.
Example: Nazi Germany invades Poland (a country with a Polish language - a slavic language), exterminates the Poles and commits genocide, and now Poland is a linguistically dominant German.
Now, if Germany won the second world war (and which nearly it won), everything that is Polish or Jewish would be rewritten or would be a priority in German language (even if it is not German).
If a person thinks it is ethical to put the other language in the creation of a language unrelated to him, he is an accomplice or supporter of Nazism or a nazist. that is, an immoral, criminal person
The difference between the German case of the Albanians is that the Nazis (Albanian terrorist - KLA and NATO who violated the UN treaties - like Nazi Germany (aka who violated League of Nations)) won and are behind a historic genocide of serbs since the Ottoman Empire.
And ethnic genocide is not enough. So now they want to commit a cultural genocide and, as they failed to blow up or burn down the Serbian churches and build Albanian mosques, they are now gradually trying to appropriate something that is not theirs. This is a tenebrous cultural theft.
Serbs at least do not put the Serbian name in Albanian mosques, as they know they are not theirs.
So why put Albanian names in historic Serbian Orthodox churches (which are ethnic Serbs like the Voski decani that was prepared to be made by serb king Stefan Dečanski)?????
Why does this disgusting nazi anti-serb revisionist double standard rules the wikipedia?
Every day I see that this wikipedia is not free and much less valid as a source, but rather in bad faith and prejudiced financied by foreigners and lobbyists, nobody is cares with the truth here.
I'm really glad that wikipedia is seen as a bad joke by the academy and by people who are aware of what they are reading.
Anyway, thats why I am not in favor of putting both names, because they are not related to WP:RS. Or at least put the Serbian (because it's theirs)
I respect your right of opinion and your opinion itself, even if i disagree.
So I’m waiting for other users to give their opinion... John L. Booth (talk) 04:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:JohnGotten.

::::::: I'm not certain accusing everyone who disagrees with you if being a Nazi helps your case, but let's see what people think.Pipsally (talk) 05:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:Orchomen.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Medieval_Monuments_in_Kosovo/Archive_1&oldid=1241856289"