Talk:Medical Assistant (MA)

Removed spam links. -THB 05:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm going to go ahead and merge them. --Life is like a box of chocolates 20:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Just to let those know who are particularly interested in the maintenance of this article: compared to a few weeks ago, the first paragraph now looks like total crap, and the statement in "e.g. USA, where they are required to be registered" is completely false. As far as my input toward the article... there are enough "self-appointed" guardinans here who in the past have taken over nicely when it came to so-called SPAM links. Why not step up to the plate now?

Just my 2 cents worth.

--Danni R. 03:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Remember, maintaining a "world wide view" although important may not necessarily apply here. The category (see disambiguation) is: healthcare providers in the U.S.. The U.S. however, has rules and regulations that can differ from state to state. That will also make it very challenging to maintaing the "world wide" view. Therefore, thaking this in consideration, I'd say the annotation of the article that is does not maintain or "... represtent a world wide view" is not needed here. --Danni R. 17:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Or, if Wikipedia's main goal is to keep content neutral and global (world wide view) then surely this article does not belong here at all, since it is not. This particular article, as stated, can never reflect the desired "world wide view" because it pertains to U.S. Health Care Providers. There is enough information available elsewhere, especially on the Internet, and libraries across the country. As a better informed Wikipedian I happen to see eye to eye with THB and many others here. I totally agree. The Medical Assistant(MA) article is regional, therefore does NOT reflect a world wide view. Anything that does not fit should go. We clean up one thing, we must also clean up others. Rules are rules. I vote for deletion. --Danni R. 17:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

put pictures!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment

My name is Danni R., I am a gal, not I guy, and I have contributed to this Wikipedia, and especially to the Medical Assistant article going on two years. I am a medical assistant, and well known for my efforts to bring medical assistants together in the Internet via free learning and networking resources. I own and manage not only the biggest and best known medical assistant websites and web forums for medical assistants on the Internet, I also work and teach in this field. So, consider me an expert among experts. My contributions, up until last week were done as a guest and so are all logged under my verizon.net dynamic IP number. I felt very very insulted but must say, that I am sure, there were no bad intentions on Wikipedia's behalf. I can all too well relate on unwanted links and SPAM.

So, giving Wikipedia members the benefit of doubt, I ask for the same back. I am indeed an active Wikipedia supporter, have made contributions of knowledge and money to the cause, and had only the best intentions when adding the two resources -SPAM removed-. Here are some of my other contributions, however, no need to go back two years! Please note that I always annotated my contributions and edits in the true spirit of Wikipedia. I have nothing to hide, and always made my intentions clear.

Due to my ongoing efforts on my own time and thousands of dollars annual out of pocket expenses to maintain these enormaous websites and web forums, xxx-thousands of new and experienced medical assistants across the country know who I am. And so... last but not least here are my latest contributions to Wikipedia (to defute the statement that the only thing I ever did was to add my own links).

23:14, 5 November 2006 Danni R. (Talk | contribs) (linked "bookkeeping" and "generalists")

23:11, 5 November 2006 Danni R. (Talk | contribs) (Added: Last but not least they serve... to "Career Opportunities", then moved the paragraph describing administrative and clinical duties up under "Scope of Practice" where it is a better fit.)

21:15, 5 November 2006 Danni R. (Talk | contribs) (small typo corrected)

20:54, 5 November 2006 Danni R. (Talk | contribs) (→Clinical Courses) 20:11, 5 November 2006 141.154.163.40 (Talk) (→Education - paragraph added about diploma mills and linked to wikipedia "diploma mills" for reference.)

23:23, 30 October 2006 70.109.226.91 (Talk) (→External links)

02:30, 19 October 2006 141.154.160.24 (Talk) (→Career Opportunities - references added.)

04:09, 13 October 2006 70.17.152.159 (Talk) (→Scope of Practice)

17:01, 28 September 2006 151.203.163.205 (Talk) (added "unlicensed")

16:28, 19 September 2006 151.188.16.36 (Talk) (→Administrative Courses) And no. I can's say that I feel, or felt bad, but I don't like it when people assume. That was my only gripe. But that's behind me now, except, I wanted to clear up that I am not just some "lurker guy" that deserves a firm stand. By far!!!! That's all I wanted to add.

Thanks StealthHound (and every Wikipedian who took time to review and respons) for the Respect.

Peace. And out.

Danni R. -SPAM removed-

--Danni R. 17:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Danni_R."

Please just stop link-spamming. It is against Wikipedia policy for you to post links to any sites with which you have any affiliation -THB 17:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a simpe response: What was removed were not links. I was very careful not to post links. What was removed was text. The text was the menition of a domain name, but not a hyperlink to a web site. However, I am completely done with this. Interesting is though, how different people see and interpret things differently. What I feel is SPAM might not be SPAM to someone else. What I consider a link, or rather hyperlink, may not be one in someone elses. And on and on it goes... It makes me smile. It must be a tough job for the administrators and the SPAM patrol.

Anyway, thanks for the well intended guidance and efforts. I will make sure I pay it forward in the true sense of Wikipedia. Peace. --Danni R. 14:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately, you're not the one who decides what is spam! -THB 15:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, yeah. Maybe I do now. (That was funny!) LOL. --Danni R. 17:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

Minor copyedits performed (idiom, punc&spell, passive voice). Also changing lead to stronger "the...tasks that keep (them) running smoothly" from "tasks...to keep". Would rather see "the...tasks that enable (them)...to run smoothly", as it's stronger still (aren't MA's the how and why it runs, not just people who "keep" someone else's smooth-running office?), but I'll wait on that a bit in case the original contributor has thoughts on this. Cheers. Joevanisland 02:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

The current photo is of Israel MDA (Magen David Adom) paramedics attending to a car crash. How is this related to being a medical assistant? Bstone 03:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Edits made to make the listing less US-exclusive by (i) including references from other countries (Canada) and to the International Standard Classification of Occupations, not just US Bureau of Statistics, and (ii) giving examples of equivalent titles in other countries for cross-referencing. (Similar edits made in page for "Clinical officers" referencing back to PAs.) Gupta, 28 Feb 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guptan99 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]