User talk:Guptan99

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to International Standard Classification of Occupations, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: International Standard Classification of Occupations was changed by Guptan99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952061 on 2011-02-23T13:58:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that ClueBot made a mistake. Just a computer script... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

This looks like a controversial merge to me. There is plenty to be said about primary healthcare that can be developed separately from Health care. You might instead consider merging it with Family medicine. JFW | T@lk 18:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also left a link to rationale for merging at primary care. Take a look when you get a chance. Did you happen to make any other merges that others might interpret as inappropriate? Thanks. Jesanj (talk) 13:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree on any potential merger between "primary care" and "family medicine", although the two topics are closely related. I have learned about the impacts of potential controversy on the one hand, versus the benefits of being "bold" in editing as suggested by others. Thank you for the useful comments. I now make sure to have a merger suggestion first to stimulate debate, such as the recent merger proposal for Malaria Awareness Day with World Malaria Day. Guptan99 (talk) 18:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Guptan99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Quick introduction to Wikipedia
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLoS
Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page.

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome! --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you have any question or concerns please drop me a note on my user page. And thanks for all the work you are doing in public health and medical admin. Cheers Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep up the good work. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, you fully deserve it

Special thanks for your contributions to Ambulatory care. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words and acknowledgement. Guptan99 (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for rewriting the clinical research associate article. It is an important concept but difficult to find sources on this specific profession. You did a great job. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Bluerasberry, just the "jolt" I needed. The article still needs more work, particularly in terms of certification and practice in different countries for a more worldwide perspective. But I hope this is a better starting point. Guptan99 (talk) 18:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health

The article WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Having originally proposed this article, I object to its deletion as I believe it meets the standard of fulfilling a historical purpose in terms of promoting the generation and dissemination of original research and learnings from policy & practice in a less-resourced and often overlooked region of the world. I have also found references in PubMed, indicating the journal is internationally recognized (and added citation as such). I have (reluctantly) removed the categorization of this journal as "public health journal" but believe it should minimally remain in the category of "WHO academic journal". I might add the article itself includes a number of inline citations, and other Wiki pages already link here. Guptan99 (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 14:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Guptan99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Guptan99. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Guptan99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]