Talk:MedicAnimal

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 May 2014. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Wikikokoba (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Untitled

Hi, I am an employee of MedicAnimal and noticed that a user named VioLuke had made an edit on our page stating that the company was bankrupt, which is not based on any legal publications and should therefore be removed. Could someone please monitor that such changes do not get published unless there has been a legal confirmation of the said status. Many thanks for any help you can give us on this.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because we have now removed any promotional or perceived as promotional material Please let me know if further edit is needed before deleting the page, thanks--Wikikokoba (talk) 12:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, could you please kindly let me know which part looks promotional so that we can deleted it before the page is deletd? Mnay thanks

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because I have now removed every mention that could be perceived as promotional --Wikikokoba (talk) 13:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed with editing

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Please help us remove the third paragraph section as it is incorrect (all sites are up and trading) and the last part of the paragraph has no verifiable source (an online article with no text) Wikikokoba (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hi. I need help with removing inaccurate information on this page. I can see that the page has now been semi-protected to prevent vandalism, which is great. However the latest edit left on the page is inaccurate. All sites are now back up and the company is trading, so those claims should be removed as they are not only incorrect but could also damage the company, it's employees and its customers. The second part of the third paragraph also cites a reference article which contains no text and therefore is not a verifiable source. Please help revert this last edit asap (i.e. the whole third paragraph should be removed). Many thanks, DvenO (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Please help me edit the awards category on this article, as I was considered to have COI with the content, being an employee of the company that is the subject of the article. the article is subject to speedy deletion, which I would like to try and avoid. I am currently reading guidelines for posting content, formatting, etc...but some initial help would be great. I'm also unsure if those are referenced correctly, could you tell me if such content as awards won by a company is acceptable content for Wikipedia? Many thanks,

Wikikokoba (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yo diggity! First off, generally "Awards" sections are omitted from Wikipedia articles about companies, and even in instances where mention of awards would be relevant, such as with an individual, they have usually been reported on by multiple news outlets. Citations are produced using the HTML ref tags, although since the Awards section is the only place where citations are incorrect, specific formatting shouldn't be too much of an issue. Instead of Awards, try elaborating the company's history or a section on its organisation: see featured articles Microsoft or BAE Systems as an example. Hope this helps, cheers ~Helicopter Llama~ 17:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hi! This is great thanks for your help, could I suggest that someone deletes the Awards section for me or is that OK for me to do this myself (re.COI etc..)? We were also planning on mentioning PR Campaigns but is that a no-go too? Thanks, Wikikokoba (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You keep mentioning "we" please be aware that Wikipedia accounts are strictly for individuals only and you may want to change your user name which implies that you are editing on behalf of a company. Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I can confirm I am the sole user of this account. By saying "We" I indeed referred to the company I work for, as I am creating this page as part of my job description (I work as a social media manager for this company) but I do understand that my username in itself is a problem and that I will need a personal name as my user name in order to do edits (i will check in Q&A section how to do so). I also understand that because of this I am in COI territory, this is why I am checking with you if I should be the one removing the awards category from the article or not. I have probably rushed a little while creating content and did not realise the amount of rules and initial set up needed for articles to be considered and not deleted so i am now starting from scratch and trying to do things properly, while trying to not get the article deleted but rather have it recreated in line with your guidelines, so any help provided would be more than welcome. Wikikokoba (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]