Talk:Mecodema

Beetles Low‑importance

	Insects portal Mecodema is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mecodema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027023319/http://www.ento.org.nz/nzentomologist/free_issues/NZEnto17_1_1994/Volume%2017-1-2.pdf to http://www.ento.org.nz/nzentomologist/free_issues/NZEnto17_1_1994/Volume%2017-1-2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo choice

Surely a good image of an actual specimen is far preferable to a drawing? ... ThorpeStephen (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. A good drawing is better than a bad photograph, Helmore's drawings are very good, and most of the Mecodema photos in Commons are not great. I prefer good biological illustration in general to most specimen photographs, which don't illustrate key features especially well. We commonly use paintings over photos in WP bird articles. But whatever, if you have a better generic photo for Mecodema, change it back. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did say a 'good image'. I agree that a good drawing is better than a bad photograph, but I wasn't suggesting that we use a bad photo. I think we need to consider the purpose of a taxobox photo: is it (1) to give people a good general idea of what the taxon actually looks like; or (2) to show all taxonomically relevant characters? I suggest that the answer is (1), but I'll leave it up to others to make the choice ... ThorpeStephen (talk) 01:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]