Jump to content

Talk:Mecca/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ovinus Real (talk · contribs) 06:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Holy_capital_(Makkah_City).png, which is used as the "official flag" of Mecca (which there is no source for, by the way) appears to be a copyright violation. I will put the nomination on hold until these copyvios are removed; if they aren't removed within a week or so I will close the nomination. Cheers, Ovinus (talk) 20:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done; but I have kept the emblem.--AccordingClass (talk) 07:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AccordingClass: I'm afraid the emblem is also a copyvio... by the same person Ovinus (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ovinus Real: Thanks for pointing it out. I've removed it... and thanks for going ahead with the review. --AccordingClass (talk) 22:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, it's not your fault we have a prolific copyright violator in our midst. XD I shall proceed in a few hours when I get home. Ovinus (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate failure criteria

[edit]
  1. Approved
  2. Approved I ran the copyvio detector, which produced https://madeinholyland.net/mecca/, but that's a copy of this page (not the other way around). The aforementioned copyvios have been removed
  3. Approved
  4. Approved
  5. Not applicable

Shall continue to the full review. Ovinus (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ovinus Real: Any updates on the review? -AccordingClass (talk) 14:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the delay AccordingClass, I'll start reviewing it now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ovinus Real (talkcontribs) 01:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there are some pretty serious issues that need to be addressed before I can pass this nomination. Paragraphs in Architectural Landmarks, Religion, Education, Economy, Geography, Modern history, Medieval and pre-modern times, Muhammad and the conquest of Mecca, and Under the Quraish are undersourced or lack sources. Thus I think I need to fail the nomination. I hope to see this article back here with more references some time. Sincerely, Ovinus (talk) 03:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some citation needed tags to help with locating places that definitely need more sources. Also, the section Ibn Battuta's description of Mecca relies on a single source, and should probably be merged into the rest of the article. Sincerely, Ovinus (talk) 04:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]