Talk:Me & U (Cassie song)

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move Skomorokh 14:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me & U (Cassie song) → Me & U — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC) Only one song name like this. No need to DIS by other song with title "Me & You". Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 07:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Me & You and Me and You for many similar names. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw them, but there's only one song named "Me & U", do we need to disambiguate the title anyway? Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 09:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support move, then place a hatnote on "Me & U" directing to Me and You. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, best choice out here. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 09:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose several uses for that title are listed on the dab page. 64.229.100.45 (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They've been added since yesterday! --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Me & U" may not need to disambiguate anyway. While "Me & You", "Me and You" really need. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 09:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 18 December 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure). SST flyer 04:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Me & U (song) → Me & U – Everything else uses the word "you", rather than the letter "U". Unreal7 (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Me and You shows various songs with "Me and U", if anything this should be back where it was at Me & U (Cassie song) In ictu oculi (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose insufficient dab. Aurally identical to "Me and You" and "Me & You", and there are also several exact matches on the dab page. It should probably be further disambiguated rather than further ambiguated – suggest move to Me & U (Cassie song). —BarrelProof (talk) 05:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. There is no other article with this title. It's highly unlikely that readers will type in or click on "Me & U", with the ampersand and "You" spelled as "U", looking for any of the other topics.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and Cuchullain. WP:SMALLDETAILS applies here, as this construct is not a very likely one for other uses of the term. — Amakuru (talk) 11:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Me & U. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306061057/http://www.riaa.com/news/newsletter/pdf/2006Certifications.pdf to http://www.riaa.com/news/newsletter/pdf/2006Certifications.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]