Talk:Matthew Gould

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Israel

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.

International relations C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Restoration of material deleted by Ebetsey and redeleted by Soosim

I have restored material which was deleted by editors whose motivation, I'm sorry to say, seems to be to remove anything negative and retain only a one-sided view of the subject. For example, the whole point of the episode of the apology to Livni is that an apology for arrest of people who committed crimes cannot have been authorised by the government, and although it may have been meant light-heartedly, it has sparked criticism of Gould as giving the appearance of bias towards Israel and against the UK and thus has been used by those who oppose his appointment. The passage was not written in an uneven way, and to delete all mention of why Livni's parents were arrested undermines the entire purpose of the passage. I restored the neutral title 'Controversies' which had been replaced by the one-sided title 'Public Attacks' because there has been controversy about Gould, some people opposing and some supporting things he has done. This should be reported in an even-handed manner. It's not appropriate to describe only negative or only positive aspects of the subject.

The initial edits by Ebetsey added substantial amounts of text (which has almost all been retained), and also deleted substantial passages, but his/her edit summary only mentioned adding passages and gave no explanation of why others had been deleted. If someone really has a problem with this information being available, perhaps they could give a rationale.88.167.23.116 (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi 88 - i will try to answer each point as best i can:

a) all negative items were retained, just rewritten using RS and appropriate language b) the livni apology: the rewritten version was more in line with the actual text in the RS and not just a lot of outside info thrown in. this is an online encyclopedia - people can click on the link to learn more - that is the entire point of the wikified terms. no need to re-explain it here as well. c) i could live with controversies versus public attacks. i doubt that either is really POV. d) other than what you just discussed - what else is missing that is problematic. i see ebetsey is not very active, but this seemed very good. we don't need him/her to move forward. Soosim (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

oh, and let me add that this article is probably now under the following sanctions which include only 1RR per 24 hours. so, be careful.

This is ridiculous article

It deals way too much with matters that are not of any importance. I'm 100% sure that it was written by Matthew Gould himself, or by someone who wrote on his behalf. It's more of a commercial and a disgrace to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.120.205 (talk) 10:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UNDUE weight to "Controversies"

Per multiple policies and guidelines, WP:STRUCTURE, Wikipedia:Criticism, Wikipedia:BLP#Due_weight, "Controversy" sections are almost inevitibly bad for encyclopedic writing and coverage of living people. The events need to integrated into chronological history or otherwise appropriately covered without being given undue weight by being called out in stand alone sections.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ok, red - go for it. it shouldn't be too hard since there are only a few items there, right? Soosim (talk) 06:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the last 'controversy', describing a conversation he had with Tzipi Livni, because it wasn't clear what was 'controversial' about it - the given source didn't contain any criticism. I've left the rest for now, as they are backed by reliable sources, but I agree this article does look a bit imbalanced towards criticism at the moment. Robofish (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

relevant content now integrated, tag removed-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Matthew Gould. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304104239/http://www.gulabin.com/britishdiplomatsdirectory/pdf/britishdiplomatsdirectory.pdf to http://www.gulabin.com/britishdiplomatsdirectory/pdf/britishdiplomatsdirectory.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://thejerusalemreport.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/her-majestys-hub/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Matthew Gould. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]