Talk:Masagana 99
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Sources removed in response to an "overcite" tag in the "Background" section
[edit]The following references were removed outright from an "overcited" fact in the Background section. These references do not seem to be needed, so I'm moving here in keeping with the WP:Preserve policy.
- Reference 1 had no link and was thus not as verifiable: Tadem, Eduardo C. "Marcoses should apologize to Filipino farmers"..
- Reference 2 appears to be a wiki-like page, sourcewatch. "Masagana 99 - SourceWatch". www.sourcewatch.org. Retrieved 2018-03-05.
Thanks - Chieharumachi (talk) 14:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Copied content from Masagana 99 to National Food Authority (Philippines)
[edit]The following content was copied from Masagana 99 to National Food Authority (Philippines):
Economists[1] generally acknowledge Masagana 99 to have failed because the supervised credit scheme it offered to farmers proved unsustainable.[1]
I have also left a note at that page's talk page. – Crisantom (talk) 13:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ a b Esguerra, E.F. (1980). "Some notes on the Masagana 99 [rice] program and small farmer access to credit [Philippines]". Philippine Sociological Review (Philippines). Retrieved 19 September 2017.