Talk:Mary Lou Jepsen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Needs some cleaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.181.24.83 (talk) 18:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was helpfull--173.206.73.188 (talk) 22:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

There are now 44 citations on the article, yet we still have a box from November 2012 that says "This biographical article needs additional citations for verification." Can I just remove that box? Is there some procedure that needs to be followed to remove the box? Does it still need more citations? Kzirkel (talk) 12:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No procedure, anyone can remove them. – SJ + 17:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

The Commons has several closer headshots, including a Quality Image submitted by me. Yet the article is using a distant head and shoulders image where she is awkwardly holding a microphone and clicker. Apparently User:Lauravelletri prefers her own image, and finds the others "unflattering", which is her opinion. She has removed images submitted by others on several occasions. Is there some way to neutrally resolve this? I would think a headshot is preferable to a distant half-body shot for the main image, no? Can't the article contain multiple images? I'm not clear what the rules are, or how to resolve disputes. - Kzirkel (talk) 11:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, more images would be good. Headshots are always preferred for infoboxes. Newer photos are generally better. I don't see any input from that user for many years, so probably this issue has been resolved. – SJ + 17:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit. I probably shouldn't care about my photo being used ... but I do think it's a pretty decent shot. - Kzirkel (talk) 19:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Mary Lou Jepsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Mary Lou Jepsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She quits Facebook/Oculus

She quits Facebook/Oculus to develop a portable MRI head scanning unit, announced 5/10/2016 http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/mary-lou-jepsen-leaving-facebook-oculus-vr/639158 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.51.60.242 (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Openwater (project)

Article is more about her involvement than the companies notability. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please, I don't watch pages) 17:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Classicwiki, I have redirected this per it being an uncontested merge. If there is anything you want to merge you can do it from the history. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Lou Jepsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004061423/http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=515 to http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=515
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.pixelqi.com/about_us

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead is waaaaaay too lengthy

The lead section of the article contains too much content. If we want to be fussy, it probably violates WP:MOS guidelines, as it is more than four paragraphs in length. I happened to be reading WP lead guidelines today, as I was revising the recently created BLP of Teresa Woodruff, who was mentioned in an article about Wikipedia in Wired a few days ago. That got me thinking about women in STEM, I am one of them in real life ;o) so I had a look at Mary Lou Jepsen's article out of curiosity. I realize that the lead of the article is what most viewers of WP articles spend the most time on; that was mentioned in MOS:LEAD too! I don't think that stuffing the lead with so many details is helpful, as the initial impression is one of a dense wall of text with peripheral things that clearly belong in the body, specifically all those details about the companies rather than about Gepson herself. This is HER biographical article, not a promotional piece for Google or a no longer extant Taiwan start-up. That information belongs in the body of the article.

Another problem with such a lengthy lead (and so many citations in the lead!) is that it makes the rest of the article seem short in comparison, thus, in my opinion, diminishing the significance of the accomplishments of the subject of this BLP. I am going to make some incremental edits to restructure the lead accordingly.--FeralOink (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shortened somewhat. I removed this as not particularly relevant: "also a member of the Xconomists, an ad hoc team of editorial advisors for the tech news and media company, Xconomy.^[1]" – SJ + 02:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "About Our Mission, Team, and Editorial Ethics". Xconomy. Retrieved 2018-01-02.

expand "openwater" potion and potentialy make it its own article

the openwater companey is nearing product launch at this point. section fails to give details / updates on the project — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "About Our Mission, Team, and Editorial Ethics". Xconomy. Retrieved 2018-01-02.

[1]