Talk:Marvel's Most Wanted/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Argento Surfer (talk · contribs) 14:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Premise
Not every reader will know what SHIELD is. I think a short descriptor, such as "..no help from S.H.I.E.L.D., the spy agency that previously employed them, they form..." in needed.
Added. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cast and characters
Who are being quoted in this section? The character descriptions should be attributed or paraphrased.
Quotes attributed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Palicki knew of the character due to her status as the Avenger Mockingbird in the comics" This isn't very clear. Was Palicki a comic reader? Is it trying to say that Palicki was aware of the character prior to taking on the role?
Clarified. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Production
"Bell compared Most Wanted to the Buffy the Vampire Slayer spin-off Angel, and said that series would be more intimate than Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." Suggest revising to "...Angel, saying the series would be...'
Changed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No pick-up and future
no concern

Lead
no concern

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
no concern
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
no concern

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
no concern

C. It contains no original research:
no concern

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
In Premise, "they form an uneasy alliance with rogue adventurer Dominic Fortune" is taken verbatim from source #4, which isn't cited in that section. This should be reworded or properly attributed. Earwig's other high ranked results are from extended quotes.
What you quoted is a reword of the information from source #1, which stated: "Bobbi and Hunter form an uneasy alliance with Dominic Fortune, a rogue adventurer with a wealth of resources and even more adversaries...". Do you still wish source #4 be added, given this? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How would you feel about "enter into an uneasy partnership"? Argento Surfer (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with me. I've changed it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
no concern

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
no concern
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
no concern
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
An editor has tried to insert some OR twice, but was reverted quickly. It has not been discussed on the talk page.
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
no concern

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
no concern
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass pending minor notes made above. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Argento Surfer: Thanks for reviewing. I've responded to your minor notes above. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
All concerns have been addressed. Nice work. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]