Jump to content

Talk:Mark Wills

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

"Inexplicably" topped the charts? I know nothing about the man, but that seems POV.

When You Think of Me

[edit]

Why is this single constantly being removed from the introductory paragraph? Matt Yeager (Talk?) 22:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe because the single didn't do as well as some of Mark's other singles. I don't think it even made the Top 20.

Well, it certainly got played a lot where I live. Great song, too. Matt Yeager (Talk?) 05:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to add a table with his singles soon. The above poster was right, "When You Think Of Me" was not a Top 20 hit. 68.188.191.9 04:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Full name

[edit]

RfC closed

First RfC response: I didn't see any discussion on this matter, so I looked into the edit summaries, and saw Mark Wills's full name removed by Swelchmgt because "Mark has requested that his real birth name not be viewable by the public for privacy and security reasons." If that's the case, it should be easy to reference that this, is in, fact his desire (which I am not even sure we would follow even then since his full name is commonly known). Otherwise, the information should be included. Removing verifiable, neutral and notable information without verification or consensus is bad practice.--Esprit15d • talkcontribs 16:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed. If the name is publically documented, there's little point in avoiding it here. If Mr. Wills wants information about himself kept off Wikipedia, it's better for him to file an OTRS ticket. However, as a public figure, he has to understand that something as simple as his real name is going to be widely known. -- Kesh (talk) 22:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that we can close it, but not with your reasoning. The question was whether the fact that the subject wants his name removed means that it needs to be removed from the article. And the consensus here is that it does not. I've removed the tag. —BradV 23:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Wills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]