Talk:Mark Williams (radio host)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark Williams (radio host) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Nominee for Time Person of the Year

Also in 2010, Williams was a nominee for Time Person of the Year.
- "Big Time predictions". Boston Herald. BostonHerald.com. 2010-12-05. Retrieved 28 December 2010.

He does not appear on Time's published list of nominees.[1] Does anyone have access to the source to see if he is actually described as a nominee? Perhaps the columnists were simply speculating that he might or should be a nominee. Will Beback talk 00:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that Youwager.com was taking bets that he'd win, but that's not the same thing as being nominated.[2] That article is a copy of of an entry on Williams' blog, which apparently is now deleted.[3] Will Beback talk 01:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Role with Tea Party Express

Is there any source which supports Williams stepping down from his role with the Tea Party Express over the satirical letter he wrote? The article states:

Williams served as the spokesperson for the Tea Party Express until he was forced to step down amid controversy over a racially charged satirical letter posted on his blog and comments that he made to the media.

However, that's not supported by the source, which seems to say the opposite - it says that the Tea Party Express stood by Williams, and thus the National Tea Party Federation expelled the Tea Party Express. That's very different from what is in the article. - Bilby (talk) 08:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it some more, I really think that the IP was right in removing that section - it isn't supported by the source used, I haven't seen any other source yet which does support it as written, and it is unclear as to what the significance of being dropped from the National Tea Party Federation is. That's enough to think that it is enough of a problem that we should probably remove it as it stands. - Bilby (talk) 08:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking. But it does not seem contentious that he stepped down during this controversy, and it is easy to find other sources which support the statement as written, e.g. the LA Times: "Tea Party Express spokesman resigns after racist blog post". (See also the current version of Tea Party Express.) I suggest replacing the New York Daily News citation with that one, and maybe also changing "forced to step down" to "stepped down".

And reading the various IP contributions, it does not seem the resignation fact was their objection against this sentence. Rather, they concerned the existence of the satirical letter itself, which is supported by various other sources, e.g. MSNBC, TIME, CNN.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 10:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That one looks better. :) Although I'd agree that "forced to step down" seems wrong, as it looks like he chose to instead. Thanks for finding that. I guess we need to hash out the wording for other part, then. I'm curious as to what the concern was, although I guess calling it a letter is a tad strong, as it looks like to was a blog post in the form of a letter. My guess would be that this isn't the problem, though. - Bilby (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Radio host?

He seems to be (or have been) this, but the details are not clear and it is not included in the first sentence. BigJim707 (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Williams (radio host). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thesunchronicle.com/articles/2006/02/20/city/city4.txt
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131128150556/http://talkermark.com/ to http://www.talkermark.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Williams (radio host). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131128150556/http://talkermark.com/ to http://www.talkermark.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]