Talk:Mark Sutton Vane

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi Rayman60 I have a number of edits which will bring this page up to 2017. Can I please ask the reason you're blocking them and what I can do to make the edits acceptable? tomstevens36 (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2016 In answer to your question about adding the content, it was poorly formatted, unreferenced in many places, promotional, perhaps excessive and breached numerous guidelines. Plus the nature of your behaviour suggests you have an ulterior reason for your activity, one to promote the subject. This flouts one of the most fundamental, core principles which have been raised in the past to various people in various guises trying to use this page to promote the subject. The first step would be to familiarise yourself with the guidelines which would advise on how to progress (most significantly, not to interfere with an article where there is a connection unless there's an issue such as a false and damaging claim). Rayman60 (talk) 17:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further talk

I have added a number of citations and links. Zorbacrayon (talk) 12:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further talk

Thank you for the warning of the proposed speedy deletion. I would be grateful to know what extra information should be added to avoid deletion. The subject of the article is a leading architectural lighting designer and is better known than many lighting designers currently in Wikepedia. (Responsible for the re-lighting of Portsmouth and Liverpool also Southwark Cathedral, St Paul's Cathedral in red light for charity, about 4 other cathedrals, 30 churches and much work for Royal families all over the world). He has articles about his work in the lighting, architectural and general press every month. For more information see www.sva.co.uk

I assumed it would be sensible to keep the article short. Should the article be lengthened to give more evidence of notability, more awards? Or should more links be added?

I look forward to your comments and assistance. Best wishes. Frederickqqq (talk) 23:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responding on your talk page, but I have removed the speedy request, since I think the subject may be notable, but that you are unaware how to assert such notability - Fritzpoll (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fritzpoll. Thank you for your constructive comments. I have added some references. There are many more that could be added for example references in books - would these help? Best wishes. Frederickqqq (talk) 22:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mark Sutton Vane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110607214118/http://www.london2012.com/press/media-releases/2009/02/london-2012-parklands-get-planning-green-light.php to http://www.london2012.com/press/media-releases/2009/02/london-2012-parklands-get-planning-green-light.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]