Jump to content

Talk:Mark Murphy (safety, born 1958)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk09:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mark Murphy (safety, born 1958); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Both articles appear to meet all the criteria. Hook is interesting (even more weird is that the one who played for the Redskins went on to be a noted executive with the Packers!) and verified. Looks good to go! BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mark Murphy (safety, born 1958)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ajpolino (talk · contribs) 21:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Gonzo fan2007, clicked here thinking I'd be learning about Packers CEO Mark Murphy, but I'm happy to be educated on someone else's life. Will get through this review asap. Ajpolino (talk) 21:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an excellently written article that was a pleasure to read. The coverage of his football career is a bit jargon-rich and might be challenging for someone unfamiliar with American football to follow, but I think it's a perfectly fine match for the likely audience. Two brief comments below, but neither requires us to hold up the review. I'm happy to pass this. Thanks for the interesting read. Ajpolino (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well-written:

  • In his last year of college, GlenOak won the 1979 WVIAC championship - I assume this is a typo and it's supposed to be West Liberty winning the WVIAC?

2. Verifiable with no original research:

  • All material is cited to sources that seem reliable.
  • His hobbies include playing racquetball and he has an interest in hand guns - it seems like we're on somewhat shaky ground saying what a 65-year-old man's hobbies are based on an interview he gave when he was 23. I'm not insisting we cut this, but I'm flagging my discomfort for you to consider.

3. Broad in its coverage

  • It's a satisfying read. I read some articles on Murphy based on what Google would serve up and didn't find any major details that you've omitted.

4/5. Neutral/Stable - Pass. 6. Illustrated - No images