Talk:Manse

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Home Living

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Too listy

It looks as if we'll have to rename this article List of people who were born or grew up in a manse sometime soon. Edward Waverley 13:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Happened to the Traditional Meaning of This Term?

This article is written from a very, very Anglo-centric perspective... The origins of this term, "manse," while eventually coming to be associated with Scots, had nothing to do with them originally... It had to do with the manorial system of the serfs working on Church land in mainland Europe... This article sucks at best and needs to be rewritten at worst... Stevenmitchell (talk) 08:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The article is pretty poor. You seem to know something about the topic. Pardon my bluntness, but don't you fix it? Blarneytherinosaur ^gabby? 12:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree, but I don't have the knowledge to fix it. See manor for overlapping coverage. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed article merger

I propose that Manse be merged into Clergy house. There doesn't seem to any great amount of information contained in the former which isn't already, or couldn't be, covered by the latter. The Clergy house article also seems to cover all other types/names of such dwellings (e.g. rectory, vicarage), with only Manse having a separate article. The Manse article doesn't, in my opinion, spell out precisely why it ought to be treated independently in this way. Grunners (talk) 11:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't start two debates please! Please put all comments at Talk:Clergy_house. Johnbod (talk) 04:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304111729/http://www.methodist.org.uk/static/rm/guidelines_for_manses.pdf to http://www.methodist.org.uk/static/rm/guidelines_for_manses.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]