Talk:Manchester Pride

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Greater Manchester Mid‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Manchester Pride bus.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Manchester Pride bus.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Manchester Pride bus.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Street closure section

I have removed (again) a lengthy section about street closures. Aside from the obvious bias of the content (which is clearly written to support the claim that the closures are unlawful), it has no reliable sources to back up the contentious material. Most of the citations are to a non-RS advocacy website called "FactsMCR". Purported documents from government officials are files on this same website. The only citations not to FactsMCR are a YouTube video (also not RS) and a dead link to the Manchester Evening News website. This last one is retrievable from archive (see here) and provides the only RS in the entire section. Unfortunately, all it documents is the presumably uncontroversial fact that the roads were closed, not the claim that the closures are illegal. Such claims should not be restored unless reliable sources can be supplied to support them. --RL0919 (talk) 15:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

It appears that the article contains a significant amount of original research. Please be cognizant of how reliable sources can be used to improve the page's veracity. --TheTsarOfLars (talk) 17:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Manchester Pride Festival.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]