Jump to content

Talk:Manchester Arndale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does anyone agree there is too much detail here? Should an encyclopaedia entry about one particular shopping centre in one particular city really include a complete list of all the shops in it? Woblosch 16:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I think some of the images in the gallery should be redistributed around the article, for example the plan could go under the redevelopment section, and the view of the site before the Arndale was built could go at the start of the history section. The article's shaping up nicely by the way. Nev1 (talk) 23:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that's the way to go. I was waiting until I had all my info in before weighing the job up. This shopping center is more complicated than I thought. Mr Stephen (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manchester Arndale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Manchester Arndale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stabbings

[edit]

Is there a reason why editors keep adding the October 2019 stabbing incident? It seems to be thoroughly non-noteworthy, yet someone keeps re-adding it to the article. Rather unhelpfully, someone has even re-added a red link to the Manchester Arndale stabbing - this article has already been deleted.

This is an article about a shopping centre - it is not appropriate for an encyclopedic article to record every minor crime that took place within its walls. Wikipedia is not a news source - this was not a notable terrorist attack and deserves no coverage here - please stop adding it to the article. Cnbrb (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Right, well thanks again for your input everyone. Glad that's sorted out.🙄 Cnbrb (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]