Talk:Mammillaria
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Here's a good starting point: Mammillaria: All about the Mammillaria Cactus Genus --buckwad 18:30, 2005 Jan 10 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mammillaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101016012902/http://www.succulentcity.org/cactaceae-mammillaria.htm to http://succulentcity.org/cactaceae-mammillaria.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Why was the name changed from Cactus?
[edit]Since the first species was described as Cactus mammillaris already by Carl Linnaeus, shouldn't that name have preference? ◅ Sebastian 18:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- See Cactus#Taxonomy and classification; in summary, the name "cactus" had become so confused that the 1905 Vienna botanical congress rejected Cactus as genus name, and conserved Mammillaria. This should be mentioned in this article, I think. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've now added a bit to the Taxonomy section. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Peter, for your explanation, the link, and your addition. Those are two interesting sections. At first I suspected that there'd be much of an overlap, but I couldn't find any. My only gripe is your use of “tangible” in the context of a cactus. Ouch! ;-) ◅ Sebastian 21:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)