Talk:Mam Tor

Derbyshire High‑importance

The article on Mam Tor is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article needs a map
	This article has an infobox

Military history: Fortifications / British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Back Tor detail

I don't think there should be any detail about Back Tor as it is a completely different summit, about two miles away along the ridge. It should have its own page. Jimdavid 07:54, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tend to agree, but where do we stop. Does every minor peak get a separate Wiki entry?. It is I concede a fairly distinctive top, but no more than Thorpe Cloud above Dovedale, which has to make do with a passing reference in the the River Dove article. I suggest you could make a redirect into the Mam Tor article for now.Linuxlad 08:05, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Walking

There are many great walks up Mam Tor, each with it's own distinctive route. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.117.228 (talk) 09:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Snowdonia from Mam Tor?

This sounds apocryphal at best. You are talking at least 100km, from an elevation of 500m. Even Manchester requires good conditions; Snowdonia is surely impossible.Gunstar hero (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not impossible (though I see the mention of Snowdonia was removed anyway). See http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/329077 (albeit that photo is taken from Bleaklow - by me :)). Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit more research, and it appears that although views from Mam Tor of the Snowdon massif itself are obstructed by Rushup Edge and/or Kinder Scout, Arenig Fawr is theoretically visible; see this computer-generated panorama (250°). But I don't necessarily think that means the mention of Snowdonia being visible should go back in to the Mam Tor article; it's hardly important to the subject, and visibility has to be really good, if my experiences elsewhere in the Peak District are anything to go by. Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If Merrick is visible from Snowdon, as the Snowdon article itself claims (with a reference - albeit not one I've checked!), then I think in theory a hill the height of Mam Tor could also be visible at a much smaller distance from Snowdon than Merrick is - it all depends on line of sight. Although I think Kinder is too much to the north to be in the way, Rushup Edge probably is indeed a bit of a block. Actually it's surprising what can be seen from hills of this size - I can personally vouch for the cranes on the Mersey being easily visible (25 years ago) from Shutlingsloe. But I agree that a mention of views to Wales from Mam Tor is hardly warranted in this article; aside from anything else, I think most visitors to the summit tend to look mostly the other way - to Kinder, Edale and the Hope Valley with its rather obvious cement works.... PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 21:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]