Talk:Malliswari (1951 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right on topic, haven't long finished watching it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

""made a cute on-screen pair" -according to whom? Well?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already it's written, "Narasimha Reddy said that Rama Rao and Bhanumathi "made a cute on-screen pair", adding that one cannot imagine anyone else as Nagaraju and Malleswari". Kailash29792 (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or else Doctor, shall i remove the inverted commas there? I don't think so that removing them would make any difference. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I think the quotes can stay as there is no formal/neutral synonym for "cute". Kailash29792 (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How about a good on-screen pair? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks to be of sound quality and well documented given the period. Nicely done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Dr. Blofeld! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]