Talk:Malliswari (1951 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Malliswari (1951 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Malliswari (1951 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

India: Andhra Pradesh / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Corinne, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 11 January 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Malliswari (1951 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right on topic, haven't long finished watching it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

""made a cute on-screen pair" -according to whom? Well?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already it's written, "Narasimha Reddy said that Rama Rao and Bhanumathi "made a cute on-screen pair", adding that one cannot imagine anyone else as Nagaraju and Malleswari". Kailash29792 (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or else Doctor, shall i remove the inverted commas there? I don't think so that removing them would make any difference. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I think the quotes can stay as there is no formal/neutral synonym for "cute". Kailash29792 (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How about a good on-screen pair? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks to be of sound quality and well documented given the period. Nicely done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Dr. Blofeld! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]