Talk:Mahrouna
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comment
[edit]Still need to add images to this article. Any comments are welcome. --Cedarstar (talk) 23:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mahrouna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707210045/http://www.baldati.com/forums/thread.php?tid=64 to http://www.baldati.com/forums/thread.php?tid=64
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.worldcitydb.com/mahrouna_6457259.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Recent edits
[edit]User:Nehme1499, your recent edit only clutter up the page...the full ref is given in the "Bibliography" section, why do you duplicate it in the "References" section? This makes it more difficult to read, in my experience, (if you search "Conder and Kitchener, 1881" you will see how this is normally done) Huldra (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Because there were previously [citation needed] templates in place of the current citations. I have no problem in removing the citations if these templates won't show up again. Also, instead of reverting my edits, manually edit what you think should be edited as I also fixed minor things in between my edits. Thanks, Nehme1499 (talk) 21:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Just change the Palmer, Guerin, and Conder and Kitchener links back to what it was, please, Huldra (talk) 21:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
