Talk:Mahim Fort
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mahim Fort article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Mahim Fort was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mahim Fort/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- Starting GAR.Pyrotec (talk) 10:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting article which is worthy of expansion, but which suffers from a lack of published information.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- The problem is lack of sources.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- The problem is lack of sources.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- As this is a fort article there should be some consideration of the layout of the fort and how it was used to defend its location. This information is unpublished, even in primary sources.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- it would be nice if this article could be expanded sufficiently to make GA. Unfortunately this is unlikely in the near future as there is no published information that could be used to expand this article. What appears in this article considerable exceeds the single paragraph in Scholberg (1995) Fortress Portugal in India: A Photographic History of the Portuguese Forts of India. New Brighton: Northstar Publications Minnesota.Pyrotec (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Maharashtra articles
- Low-importance Maharashtra articles
- B-Class Maharashtra articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Maharashtra articles
- B-Class Mumbai articles
- Mid-importance Mumbai articles
- B-Class Mumbai articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Mumbai articles
- B-Class Indian history articles
- Low-importance Indian history articles
- B-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class Indian military history articles
- Indian military history task force articles
- Start-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles