Talk:Magni M-14 Scout
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magni M-14 Scout article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Flydat
[edit]Isn't it a bit over the top to describe the Flydat as an "engine-indicating and crew-alerting system" ? AFAIK this is no more than a compact alternative for a bunch of analog indicators for engine parameters such as RPM, oil pressure and temp, and a few more. I should think that "engine monitor" is a better description for such a device. EICAS after all is a term typical of the airliner environment. Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Good point! The cited Bayerl ref calls its a "Flydat digital engine management system", so I have changed the text to reflect the ref. - Ahunt (talk) 00:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for checking, and for going along. To be frank, I think we ought to go a step further. Not wanting to discredit Mr Bayerl, I still think the best reference is the maker of the equipment. Now check the Flydat manual and you will read <quote>The FLYdat represents an instrument especially developed for Rotax aircraft engines for indication and acquisition of engine operating data readily accessible for the pilot.</quote>(my italics)<source= www.rotax-owner.com/manuals/flydat_user.pdf /source>. The term "management" is imho misleading: to manage the engine, the apparatus needs to have some "write" access to it, which it hasn't. I therefore insist that the Flydat should be termed an engine monitor, no less no more. Jan olieslagers (talk) 05:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- BTW Should this Flydat not have its own article, or at least a paragraph in the 912 article? Jan olieslagers (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Okay that sounds fine to me, we don't want to "oversell" it, "engine monitor" it is. It can have its own article if there are some third party refs to support it. - Ahunt (talk) 12:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Magni M-14 Scout. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121201025631/http://www.magnigyro.it/inglese/scout.htm to http://www.magnigyro.it/inglese/scout.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)