Talk:Magnetic flux leakage

Started to wikify

I've started to wikify this article. Mostly just cosmetic stuff. The next step is to start culling much of the information that is specific to to the use of MFL in pipeline inspection. I imagine there are other uses, though I am only aware of this one. Perhaps this information could be moved to a more specific page of MFL in pipeline inspection. Mrmcgibby 23:32, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your help! RRempel 19:36, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am qualified to work on this page, as our company designs and builds MFL tools for use in wells as well as pipelines.

Indeed, MFL has many uses in addition to pipelines - essentially anywhere that ferromagnetic materials are used where their cross section and accessibility makes it possible to magnetize them to appropriate levels - steel cables and storage tanks for example.

But wouldn't it be better to augment the page rather than to cull it? Pipeline inspection represents a major use, if not the primary use, of MFL technology.

I need to get up to speed on Wiki format, though. I currently have the knowledge, but not the skill, to help in upgrading this page. If I can be of assistance in any other way, please feel free to contact me at js_07_m_378@yahoo.com.

Js07m378 16:34, Office of Pipeline Safety states: "MFL is the most commonly used ILI method for the detection of corrosion in pipelines."
ILI = In Line Inspection
cited from OPS Research: Past, Present and Future, http://ops.dot.gov/init/rsrch/2001PigConf_OPSPaper.htm
This link takes you to the OPS library site. Type "OPS research" into the Search box and the cited paper should be the top item in the list.

Too technical? It is not necessary to delve into Maxwell's equations to understand MFL. The principle is simple. And the results of the MFL inspections are critical to the safety and well being of the general population and the environment. Perhaps the key phrase in your comment is "as it exists now". I have some presentation slides used in our client seminars that illustrate the principle. I'll see what I can put together.

Js07m378 15:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mis-leading title

The title of this page actually describes a common phenomenon in physics. It is a rich topic, deserving of a Wiki page. However, it is here being used to describe a technology for diagnosing pipelines, which happens to make use of the phenomenon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad000000 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The situation is indeed very confusing. This page needs to be renamed to Magnetic flux leakage (testing technique). Викидим (talk) 19:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It might be appropriate to add a disambiguation jump to Leakage Inductance, the electrical property pertaining to a portion of a transformer coil where there is magnetic flux leakage, that being the portion of flux that does not couple with the secondary coil(s). The leakage is equivalent to adding a separate inductor in series with an ideal transformer coil. 99.127.142.81 (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]