Talk:Magnetic Island

	Australia portal Magnetic Island is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Pirate Legend

Does anyone have any information on the Flaming Pearls of Magnetic Island? It is a pirate legend from the year 1680BC. Any info would be gratiously recieved.

Unlikely to be the same magnetic island mate, first known European records of the area are from the 18th century AD. - A.Hannay

You might be better off posting the request at Talk:Pirate or Talk:Piracy in the Caribbean. Editors working on those pages may know more about pirate legends. Editors working on this page are more likely to be interested in Australian geography. Good luck. -- Adz 23:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Magnetic Island National Park

The content is very small and shows little sign of developing. Merging it to the parent article makes sense until such time as there is sufficient material for a stand alone article. A redirect should be left in place after the merge. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. In this case I think a merge and redirect is appropriate. - Shiftchange (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo

The infobox photo is about Townsville in the foreground with a dim view of Magnetic Island in the background (and the eye is drawn to Townsville as it is brighter). Could we use a photo that was more informative about what the island actually looks like? There are a number photos of Commons that I think would be better (see thumbs to right):

plus there are a bunch of suitably licensed images on Flickr that we could upload to Commons if preferred. What do others think? Kerry (talk) 03:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the full view of the Island (the current infobox photo) is neceesary in the article, though it does not have to be in the Infobox. I agree that we can upload those photos from Flicker to the Commons, and i have done some--Coekon (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magnetic Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130623001623/http://blog.discoverqueensland.com.au/queensland-islands-the-top-5-qld-island-holiday-locations/ to http://blog.discoverqueensland.com.au/queensland-islands-the-top-5-qld-island-holiday-locations/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]