Talk:Magnesite

	Earth sciences portal Magnesite is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Magnesite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

Some material suppliers also called MgO ( commonly known as magnesia ( like MgOH ) to add confusion ) magnesite ! Always check which material you are discussing !

Merger Proposal

I think this page should be merged with Magnesium Carbonate because they are the same substance, and there is no need for two pages on this. I believe that this page should be absorbed because of the non-scientific name. --Ralf42 (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. This page is a mineralogy article about the mineral - that page is a chemistry article about the chemical compound. There exist hundreds to thousands of mineral articles on Wikipedia, each of which has a chemical formula, but they are distinct from the articles about the chemical compounds forming those naturally occurring minerals. The scientific field of mineralogy has developed its own system of nomenclature over the past two or more centuries of study and work. Just because the nomenclature is not rigerously controlled by IUPAC ... Vsmith (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Layout Problem

There is something fundamentally wrong with the layout of the equation on the MAGNESITE page. However, I dare not interfere. Could someone take the trouble to correct the layout? Thank you ever so much! JeffDellbart (talk) 09:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Balanced the equation - was that the problem with the "layout"? Vsmith (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a clean up

The article's initial statement is very confusing. It is also very incomplete in other sections Occupational safety and health doesn't seem to have a purpose at all. --109.49.141.100 (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Isotopic Structure

I added points on isotopic structure and information we can gain from this. With increasing focus on magnesites (from Mars as well as carbon sequestration perspectives), this new tool seems to be very helpful in understanding genesis. SurjyenduB (talk) 06:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It may be a worthy topic, but it now is most of this article, which seems like undue emphasis. Would it not be better to have a very brief discussion of just its most magnesite-relevant aspects here, and save the rest for Clumped isotopes? --Kent G. Budge (talk) 22:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there is way too much isotopic structure explanation here in comparison to the rest of the article content. It is difficult on a first reading to tell how it is relevant and obscure the other important content in the article. A third option is to create a "Clumped structure in magnesite" article if that's absolutely necessary. Mrfoogles (talk) 23:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]