Talk:Madera Canyon (Arizona)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Madera Canyon (Arizona) was copied or moved into Madera Canyon, Arizona with this edit on 22 Oct 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Madera Canyon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323235855/http://www.pimasheriff.org/files/3812/6929/8203/CompleteHistoryBook.pdf to http://www.pimasheriff.org/files/3812/6929/8203/CompleteHistoryBook.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To move material related to the former town from the Madera Canyon (Arizona) article to Madera Canyon, Arizona, rather than to merge. Klbrain (talk) 09:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Madera Canyon, Arizona, is effectively a ghost town with a well-developed campground built over it. All but a hand full of the homes were evicted and demolished. The main topic for the settlement is better covered now in this page.

IveGoneAway (talk) 03:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. A geographic feature and a populated place are sufficiently distinct to merit different articles. Libcub (talk) 08:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Libcub: You are not wrong, as far as that goes. However, the fact remains that the topic of the populated place that once was in the canyon is only covered in the geographic feature page (3rd and 4th paragraphs of History). The community is not at all covered in the Madera Canyon, Arizona page.

It was necessary to evict, demolish, and reclaim the community to develop the recreational area.

Would you suggest moving much of the community History to the populated place page? This content is the entire basis for the notability of the populated place page, should it ever be challenged for deletion as other similar communities have been.

IveGoneAway (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC) 00:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC) IveGoneAway (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, as the (formerly) populated place is best contextualized on the arguably more important page that focusses on the geographical feature. Formal reasons are context, short text and overlap. Klbrain (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as per Libcub - any relevant information on the canyon page could also be contained on this page. At the very least either a {{main}} or "See also" mention of the populated place on the canyon is warranted.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Done Klbrain (talk) 09:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]