Talk:Made Made Snana
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The neutrality of this article is disputed. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
NPOV dispute
[edit]My main problem with this is the defensive language used in this article. "Anti-Brahminism," "accused of causing social strife," the general sloppiness makes me supucious of the whole article. Happy to hear from the author, though. Mousemenace (talk) 23:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
some opposing people & their leanings
[edit]Do not know if we should add this to the article, as it is common knowledge...
- G. K. Govinda Rao - Naxal
- Kota Shivaram Karanth - Atheist
- G.V. Srirama Reddy - Marxist
Also, Karnataka Backward Classes Awareness Forum is probably a political vehicle. --光103.227.99.111 (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Calling Rao a Naxal when he has stated he doesn't support them[1] is a violation of our WP:BLP policy. This is just an attempt to smear opponents of Made Made Snana. And of course an "awareness forum" is a political vehicle, there's no problem with that. A lot of religious movements are also political vehicles. Doug Weller talk 14:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Do you always take politician's words as the truth ? Well on second thought, I guess that's why “ISIS supporter Hillary” gets to run for the next US president. Dumb westerners ! --光103.227.99.111 (talk) 15:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)