Talk:MOA-2009-BLG-387Lb
 | MOA-2009-BLG-387Lb has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 22, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the characteristics of the extrasolar planet MOA-2009-BLG-387Lb are difficult to estimate because data on its host star's characteristics are not well-constrained? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Few sources
[edit]Two sources only? Is that all there is? Limited sourcing suggests notability issues. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- There are surely more, and I'll look as soon as I can. I had felt that, as it was, it met WP:GNG, and that notability had already been established. --Starstriker7(Talk) 22:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:MOA-2009-BLG-387Lb/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: —Eustress talk 04:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
This article appears to me to satisfy all Good Article criteria. Regarding notability, a concern raised by another editor previously, I believe WP:GNG is also satisfied. The significant coverage provision of the policy has less to do with multiplicity of coverage and more to do with substance derived from the source pertaining to the subject. In this case, there is an entire article from a reliable source dedicated to the planet.
I believe the lead could be presented more concisely per WP:LEAD, and I think the Characteristics section should be merged with the Host star section, and the Main article link removed since the star is already wikilinked throughout the article. However, these are minor issues and no reasons to hold up GA status. Therefore, my decision is to pass to GA status. Congratulations. —Eustress talk 04:58, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)