Talk:MISFET
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Is there a compelling reason this cannot be merged with and redirected to MOSFET. In practice the term MOSFET seems to be used even in cases where it is technically a MISFET. TStein (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. MISFETs are new, emerging technolgies, hence the new term for new things. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Since MOSFETs are a subset of MISFETs. it is not a new class, although there may be new instances of the class being developed. SpinningSpark 19:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Can any one tell what is the advantage of MISFET over MOSFET
- Merged. Citations in some books go back to the '80s - if this term hasn't become predominant in the last 30 years, it's not going to. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Reverted. A redirect to a completely unexplained "MOSFET" is thoroughly unhelpful. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:42, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Merged. Citations in some books go back to the '80s - if this term hasn't become predominant in the last 30 years, it's not going to. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)