Talk:MI-5 Persecution
 | This article was nominated for deletion on July 2008. The result of the discussion was REDIRECT. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Happy New Year! Although he's been around, more people are just starting to notice him. Therefore, I have created a page named for the commonality in his subject line, which is now slightly changing to avoid spam filters. I fully expect vandalism here, since people hate him, so please help me take care of this page. MMetro (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Even though google banned him, he is apparently getting around it through proxies. Just look at any newsgroup that is has fallen into disuse. I found a quote of his first Orwell 1984 post, unfortunately, because google's usenet archive is incomplete. He posted a few earlier than than that. Family Guy Guy (talk) 06:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Reason against Speedy Deletion
[edit]There are other articles on controversial Internet figures, he is listed as a notable Usenet personality, he has recently changed his tactics, and people trying to find out why he is posting need somewhere to look. They will not think of searching Notable Usenet Personalities. Therefore, at the very least, there should be a REDIRECT. I have spent the last hour cleaning up this article, it started as copied from NUP, but it is referenced. What more does Wikipedia want? MMetro (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
What more does wikipedi a want.?
[edit]Hello, and thanks for making this better than it was. It's still borderline, but not as egregious as an attack page. Please read WP:BLP for information about what to include and what to avoid in articles about living people. We will need verifiable sources not connected with the source. (See WP:RS and WP:V) Examples of his posts don't count. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia needs Secondary sources. Things written by the author are primary sources. The synthesis of primary sources may be unacceptable as original research. Third party reporting-- books and reputable news articles-- are usually the best. Hope this helps. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 22:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)