Talk:M9 bayonet

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blades (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades articles

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Untitled

Looks good to me, but the wording is a little off in some places. i fooled around with it a little bit but i couldnt make it right killkola —Preceding comment was added at 09:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First paragraph contains several sentences about patenting and commercial sales unrelated to the quality, history, or behavior of the subject. It reads like someone griping in public about counterfeiters, which is important to the article, but I don't think it belongs at the beginning. ExLegeLibertas —Preceding undated comment added 22:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on M9 bayonet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Features

Yes, it does have a wire-cutter feature, but also (if memory serves) a hollow "survival" handle.

Kortoso (talk) 09:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strength

"Although it has been claimed that the M9 may be more prone to breakage than the older M7, the M9 bayonet has a 20% thicker blade and tang (0.235" vs. 0.195") and a 75% greater cross-sectional area of steel in the blade than the M7." needs to be better worded. Having a thicker blade / greater cross section DOES NOT magically denote whether it will be more prone to breaking or not. Type of steel, process, etc, have way more to do with durability than simply dimensions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19E:8080:98D0:2D45:7B77:1518:A307 (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

M9 vs AKM bayonet

This article claims the M9 is an "improved" version of the AKM (type 1 or 2) bayonet. The M9 does not have a full tang, and is easily broken at the intersection of the blade and the handle, whereas the AKM bayonets are not. The M9's sheath also has a screwdriver, which had to be relocated due to injuries caused by it digging into combatants' legs. The AKM bayonets did not face this problem. Therefore, it is not an improvement. 70.181.151.71 (talk) 06:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]