Talk:M116 howitzer

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Shell (projectile)#High-explosive|HE]] Anchor Shell (projectile)#High-explosive links to a specific web page: High explosive. The anchor (#High-explosive) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Shell (projectile)#High-explosive, anti-tank|HEAT-T]] The anchor (#High-explosive, anti-tank) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Service

When did it leave service? Judging by this page at Olive-Drab.com it seems to still be used in a ceremonial role, and I imagine it coming in handy in Vietnam. This page suggests that the Indian Army continued to use it as a mountain gun until recently. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, the US forces didn't use the 75 mm howitzer in combat after WWII, but there are many photos of the gun being used as a ceremonial piece. Also, some carriages were combined with the M30 4.2 inch mortar to create what was known as "howtar", and these were indeed used by the Marine Corps in Vietnam ( [1] ).

The gun did see combat in Vietnam though - by the North Vietnam ( [2] , [3] ). The guns were transferred to North Vietnam by Chinese ( [4] ). The article also briefly mentions that some of these fell into Chinese hands during the Korean War (I'd like to see a confirmation).

The British Army used the 75 mm howitzer in Yemen in 1957 ( [5] ).

Didn't know about the Indian Army. Bukvoed (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More: One book ( [6] ) mentions 11th Marines artilery regiment in Korea circa May 1951 forming an extra battalion armed with 75 mm pack howitzers captured from the Chinese.

I also came across a story about 75 mm howitzers of 463rd PFAB being used against enemy armor in Ardennes, apparently with some degree of success ( [7] ). Bukvoed (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M1A1 / M1A

model number on the cannon nameplate says M1A by Hannifin Mfg Co, 1942 (not M1A1). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.220.9.5 (talk • contribs)

Weird. The standard format of WWII-era US weapon designations is M<number>A<number>, not M<number>A. As for this specific howitzer, all sources I know refer to it as M1A1, from Technical Manual TM 9-319, which is definitely called 75mm Pack Howitzer M1A1 and Carriage M8 to Hunnicutt's books on US armored vehicles.Bukvoed (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changed back to M1A1. Bukvoed (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M116 howitzer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160301101551/http://uxoinfo.com/blogcfc/client/includes/uxopages/Mulvaney_Details.cfm?Ord_Id=P18 to http://uxoinfo.com/blogcfc/client/includes/uxopages/Mulvaney_Details.cfm?Ord_Id=P18

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should the titles specify the calibers?

I think the titles should specify the calibers, e.g. "75 mm Howizter M116." I am not making a formal move proposal, because I am not sure how best to do this, and because the same issues apply to several other artillery pieces.

Reason 1: People may be looking for the "75 mm pack howitzer," or the "75 mm howitzer M1." Including the caliber makes it easier to find from lists such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_artillery_of_the_United_States,

Reason 2: It was introduced as the M1, so the M116 isn't a great identifier. It was 75 mm the whole time, so it's a better, if not specific, identifier. 173.66.5.216 (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pack howitzer in Ukraine

Any talk of of this portable howitzer being sent to assist the Ukrainian Army 192.63.146.237 (talk) 16:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]