Talk:M. E. Aldrich Rope

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 11 May 2015 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

‹See TfM›

Glass

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Women's History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... I own the copyright to the material as it is from my own website. The article has already been deleted once by Deb and restored at my request. If you give me time I will try to satisfy you over the copyright issue in the way you prescribe. It is very discouraging to the submitters of new articles if action is taken so fast that there is no time to correct errors highlighted. Do you not want to enrich the scope of Wikipedia? This article is about a significant stained glass artist from a group, many of whom already have Wikipedia articles to their name --Pangapilot (talk) 17:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is that they for example have NOT had their contents lifted 100% from another source. Where is your website anyway? Anyhow, you may wish to look at WP:DCM for help, but be advised if "your" website is also infringing another's copyright, then that cannot be overridden. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The text on suffolkpainters.co.uk came from my website in the first place. I wrote the article for artbios too! The problem here is that my website http://www.arthur.rope.clara.net has been live since 2001 and over the years has been freely plagiarised by other sites. Now I am being called up for copyright infringement of text which began at my website in the first place!! To be clear: the text on suffolkpainters was derived from my website in the first place: it's all rather ironical! Pangapilot (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

My website is www.arthur.rope.clara.net. The material on it is my own work or derived from research. Will all this palaver be avoided is I simply paraphrase my own material?Pangapilot (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not keen on the "quotation marks" on "your". I am Arthur Rope and my website is my website without quotations. I find the tone of all this intervention rather too strongPangapilot (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on trying to satisfy Deb's comments and would appreciate some time - days, not minutes, please Pangapilot (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See "I own the source, or work for the owner of the source, can I copy it to Wikipedia?". So I would suggest not- far better to 're-write' the article, using, of course, any knowledge available to you, but using the original sources rather than that website. Read the notes on close paraphrasing, and why it is not encouraged.I moved the article into your user space, but someone else will doubtless point out that as your user-space is still viewable, so is the illegal material- so should still be removed speedily. As another section says:

Can I copy and paste text into a user page or talk page in order to work on it?... No. Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted material anywhere, not even in talk or user pages, not even temporarily

A total re-write calls.
PS. As you might have gathered WP takes copyright very seriously; hence the strength of my intervention. And it appears that you may wish to read up on another Wiki policy too while you're there- that of conflict of interest; i.e., being personally close to the subject. Best of luck with it though!_Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance. I'm rewriting and improving as guided. I cannot emphasise enough that apart from myself and Peter Cormack (who I reference), there is no-one writing about this artist and yet her works are spread worldwide. All the text derives from his or my research. Someone has to do an article on her and I am stepping forward. If after full publication other users feel it is inappropriately phrased I imagine they will edit accordingly. You still refer to illegal material but I strongly assert that there is nothing illegal here from the copyright angle.Pangapilot (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You will notice that the text is now pared down even further to avoid the slightest hint of copyright issues. Much information has been removed but if that is the price that must be paid, so be it. WP is the poorer, I'd say Pangapilot (talk) 21:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]