Talk:M-V

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

December 2005

I thought this is in fact M-V... See ISAS site. It might be better to move. - Marsian / talk 10:40, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, M-V does seem to be the correct name, used in all the sources I've looked at (including the "parent" Mu (rocket) article, and the Japanese/German versions of this article). I would support a name "move", unless someone can source a good reason to keep "M-5" the primary name. Earlier rockets in the series were called "Mu-1" and "Mu-3", perhaps explaining the confusion. -- Rwendland 11:42, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

~~Perhaps since the existing redirect M-V has page history, I couldn't move (swap) this page to M-V, so I requested move. - Marsian / talk 06:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)~~[reply]

Obvioustly, there's another possibility of M-V rocekt. Missing this point was totally my fault thus I withdrew my request. - Marsian / talk 10:59, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ICBM-Version

The Japanese don't need such a heavy long-range missile to hit their neighbor North Korea.--Arado 15:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

M-5 was terminated.

M-5 launcher has been terminated. I think "National Security" section is no longer appropriate. We should remove the section. It is a very strange section anyway. I guess Japan hater wrote it. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.139.200 (talk • contribs) 04:57, 24 September 2006

When you say terminated, do you mean that it has been retired, and will not be launched again. Do you have a cite for this? I was under the impression that it is still active, and infact, I have a cite that one is scheduled to launch in 2008, with the PLANET-C Venus orbiter. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 11:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. If you can read Japanese, there are tons of news source for that. Otherwise PLANET-C is one. M-5 is infamous for its launching cost and incapablity for quick launching even though it is a solid fuel rocket. No way to make it a missile. They have a plan to develop a smaller rocket to reduce launching cost.

Requested move

M-5 rocket → M-V – Official name uses roman numerals[1] as opposed to numbers. Article should do the same. (Move is over redirect with history). GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 13:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it. —Mets501 (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 18:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to MV (4) failure

http://www.isas.ac.jp/docs/sat/astro-e/prompt_report.html

in case it's useful. Matt Whyndham 11:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Main picture

Resolved

– Caption modified per discussion. (sdsds - talk) 21:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the main picture of this launch vehicle need to be of a failure? With most launches being successful, I found this to be inappropriate and demeaning to JAXA.ModernGeek (talk) 06:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the current image illustrates the rocket well. The image does not show anything abnormal or related to the failure, so it is still representative, and I see no reason to censor it for the protection of JAXA. If we limit information on that flight, it would be difficult to maintain a neutral point of view. So I would oppose any change of image, unless I feel the replacement is a better image than the current one. --G W… 10:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the image; remove the second sentence of the caption. (sdsds - talk) 03:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, Keep the image; remove the second sentence of the caption. Though there are other good images in the commons. Rwendland (talk) 13:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M-V. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110406035626/http://www.ihi.co.jp/ia/en/product/rocket.html to http://www.ihi.co.jp/ia/en/product/rocket.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on M-V. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]