Talk:Lunocet

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Cleanup

This article is in need of cleanup - it reads rather like an advert for a product. Inline citations would be better than just listing a Scientific American article. The blog is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. There is nothing there to assert or establish the notability of the subject. Suggest that you start by studying Wikipedia:Your first article. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above. The current article is unacceptable, and may not pass notablity requirements. I will cut the worst of the hype and see if I can find any supporting references. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 10:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up what was there, but citations are proving difficult, as the links provided are broken, except for the Scientific American article, which provides very little.

There are blogs which contradict several of the claims, and list a whole lot of problems not mentioned in the article, but they are blogs, and not particularly suitable as citations. See: https://www.deeperblue.com/concerning-the-lunocet/

http://caw-designs.com/?page_id=1250 http://www.ultimateswimfin.com/ https://www.deeperblue.com/lunocet-pro-2015-review/ may be useful, if they are still there when needed. There has been a lot of development and the latest version is very different from the original. The 2009 SA article is very out of date. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 12:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Lunocet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

This article is pure product spam. There's a grand total of one reliable source, the rest is straight from the manufacturer. I think it should be deleted and replaced with a non-brand-identifying sentence in monofin. Orpheus (talk) 02:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]