Talk:Luke Hall (politician)
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 23 May 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Luke Hall (politician) → Luke Hall – Politician is more notable. Hatnote will suffice.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 23:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Mahveotm (talk) 09:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Could you please explain your reasoning? Do we not want "notable" article titles? Tony (talk) 06:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- 5x as many views. Unreal7 (talk) 21:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support per WP:TWODABS. We do not need a disambiguation page, only hatnotes, when only two articles are involved. Traffic indicates people are more often looking for the politician article, so it appears to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (That's not always a certain thing – there can be brief spikes in popularity of a topic, but a political election that was over three years ago is probably not such a spike). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 15:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. Political figure with with no international renown. Not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose, no clear primary topic. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support The oppose !vote misunderstands the meaning of primary topic. A page must not reach some arbitrary threshold of renown to be the primary. It's about relativity to other pages with the same name. In this case, stats indicate a primary topic. A hatnote will resolve the TWODABS situation.--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose this is just not worth fussing about. For South Africans the swimmer will be more notable. Leave as a dab In ictu oculi (talk) 10:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles