Talk:Lucky Lou's

Beer Low‑importance

	Beer portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Dallas-Fort Worth (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

Problems with this article

I made an attempt to improve this article earlier but I see I have been reverted. Oh well. Some of the problems include:

Poor references; almost none of the references still work, and most of them look like they should never have been used in the first place. See WP:IRS for details of how to identify better sources.
Written like an advertisement; this article has (rightly) been tagged as being an advert for several years.
Dishonest use of sources; in the few cases where the "sources" still exist, it seems clear that they do not actually support the text they are being used to support.

I would like to see some progress on fixing this please. Reverting poor and unsupported material may make it look like you have a conflict of interest. Thanks a lot. --The Huhsz (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sulfurboy, I know you reverted in annoyance yesterday, but the problems won't go away. If you've nothing to add to this discussion which I started at your request, I ask you not to revert again when I reinstate the edits I made yesterday. There was material there that should never have been there, linked to sources that would never have been good enough and which no longer exist. I think the bar looks like a lot of fun and is probably marginally notable enough to have an article here, but the article probably shouldn't have The large outdoor patio area is popular amongst locals when the weather is nice. sourced to a reviews site which no longer exists. Agreed? --The Huhsz (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Huhsz, You openly admitted to finding and gutting this article as a revenge tactic for me placing a maintenance tag on one your pages. I have zero interest in working with you. If you continue to harass me or things I work on, then I'm taking this to dispute resolution/admin noticeboard. Please leave me alone and I'll do the same with you. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. You sound very angry that your work was held up to the same scrutiny you expect to hold others to. That isn't very logical, is it? I am fine to leave you alone, but you mustn't revert back the policy-busting material a second time. Does that sound reasonable? Removing material such as I highlighted above cannot be described fairly as "gutting" it; more a cleanup of material that shouldn't have been there in the first place and has been tagged as inappropriate for six years. --The Huhsz (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, that wasn't too smart, was it? You seem very sensitive if you view this as harassment, but since you feel that way I'll leave you to it. The article can't stay this way forever, or even for another six years, as you well know, but I can see it is really important to you to fix it yourself. Fair enough I suppose. If I swing by in a day or two and the ADVERT material is still there, I'll ask for another opinion. Have a nice evening. --The Huhsz (talk) 19:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]