Jump to content

Talk:Lucena, Philippines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content removal

[edit]

Television Networks:

[edit]

Radio Stations:

[edit]
  • Spirit FM 103.9 (Official Catholic Radio Station, member Catholic Media Network)
  • Campus Radio 91.1
  • KissFM 95.1
  • Bay Radio 92.7
  • Sigaw 96.7
  • Big SoundFM 97.5
  • OneFM 98.3
  • Love Radio 100.7
  • HotFM 105.3
  • The Edge Radio 90.3
  • DWLC AM Radyo ng Bayan
  • DZAT AM Himpilan ng Katotohanan (pentecostal Radio)
  • DZEL AM Radyo Aguila (Iglesia ni Cristo Radio)
  • DZRH AM Lucena
  • DZLT AM Phil. Radio
  • DZAQ AM ( official Radio of Pastor Apolo Quibuloy, the new son of god?)

Education

[edit]

Lucena City is home to many known colleges, schools, academies, universities and international schools.

  • Maryhill College (formerly Maryknoll Academy)
  • Sacred Heart College
  • Holy Rosary Catholic School
  • International School for Better Beginnings
  • Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation
  • Calayan Educational Foundation Incorporated
  • Quezon National High School
  • Lucena City National High School
  • Infra Comm Asia Learning Institute
  • Informatics
  • St. Anne College
  • AMA Computer University
  • AMA Computer Learning Center
  • Philippine Tong-Ho Institute
  • Lucena City College
  • Infant Jesus Montessori Center
  • Metro Lucena Computer College
  • Columbus Maritime Institute
  • Inter Global Maritime College
  • K.S. International School
  • United Computer Educational Institute
  • STI College
  • Magill Memorial School
  • Scoula Gesu Bambino
  • Quezon Technological Institute
  • QCRS

Transportation

[edit]

Among the bus lines that serve the Manila-Lucena route and are housed in the Grand Central Terminal are:

  • Jac Liner (bound to LRT-Taft and Cubao-Kamias)
  • AB Liner (enroute from Guinayangan to Alabang and Pureza in Sampaloc)
  • Barney AutoLines (enroute from Guinayangan to Alabang and Cubao)
  • Lucena Lines (sister company of Jac Liner, bound to LRT-Taft and Cubao-Kamias)
  • Jam Transit (bound to LRT-Taft and Cubao-Kamias)
  • Grand Star (bound to LRT-Taft and Cubao-Kamias)
  • N. Dela Rosa Transport (bound to Alabang and Lawton)
  • Tritran (bound to LRT-Taft and Cubao-Kamias)

Quick Facts as of 2006

[edit]
  • Total Population : 225,516 (2006 projection)
  • Population Density : 2,483 persons/sq.km.
  • No. of Households : 45,902 (2006 projection)
  • Ave. Household Size : 4.85 persons/household
  • Population Growth Rate : 2.12% per year
  • Day Care Centers : 63
  • Public Elementary Schools : 40
  • Private Elementary Schools : 21
  • Internal Revenue Allotment (2005) : P 264,404,332.81
  • LGU Income (2006) : P 404,614,774.71
  • Lucena City Tax Revenue Collection (2003) (Revenue District Office No. 60 covering Lucena City and all the towns in the First and Second Legislative Districts of Quezon Province) : P 3,259,550,000.00
Reason: Wikipedia is not a guide nor a directory. --βritand&βeyonce (talk•contribs) 05:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

<Cityname> <City>

[edit]

There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities. This may imminently affect the article name for Lucena, Philippines. For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented. Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion. If you wish to participate, please post your comments here. --JinJian (talk) 05:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move Lucena City → Lucena, Philippines, Valenzuela City → Valenzuela, Philippines, Angeles City → Angeles, Philippines as compromise solution because (1) opposition to current names is strong per WP:COMMONNAME, (2) opposition to proposed names disambiguated with "(Philippine city)" is strong as unsupported type of disambiguation per any guideline or convention, (3) regardless of what may have been stated at another discussion, no opposition has been expressed here to these names since they were proposed by User:LtPowers over a month ago (8 November) which are consistent with how cities in most countries are disambiguated.

Even at the other discussion very little explanation for opposition to this convention is given, and only by one person. If anyone is really opposed to disambiguating with ", Philippines" then they should propose another move and see if there is consensus support for their view. I just don't see it expressed here it all, much less explained. Born2cycle (talk) 07:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Lucena City → Lucena (Philippine city) — Part of series of multiple page move requests involving Philippine cities under the category Local highly urbanized city name is the same with that of other foreign city, municipality but no other local city/municipal with the same name. This request is made after preliminary discussions for the removal of the word "city" from most of the article titles of Philippine cities and providing disambiguation wherever necessary. For more information please see Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines/Task_force_LGU#Article_names_for_Philippine_cities:_.3Ccityname.3E_.3Ccity.3E. Relisted for further input. Jafeluv (talk) 11:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC) JinJian (talk) 06:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This makes sense as explained in WT:Tambayan Philippines/Task force LGU. I am under the impression that Filipinos call Angeles City simply Angeles. Is this the city's proper name? Is the word "City" not formally part of the name? Is this the case with other cities in Philippines? / edg ☺ ☭ 20:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose moving Angeles City. I have no opinion on most of these moves, but Angeles City is commonly known exactly that way in English, and it's better known in English than most Philippine cities are due to the bar trade. — Gavia immer (talk) 00:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
While Angeles City like any other Philippine cities may not be totally uncommon, I doubt that it is more prominent than Angeles especially by the locals in their everyday language. --JinJian (talk) 03:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Their everyday language is unlikely to be English, and we go by the common name in English. For most of the nominated pages, there isn't going to be any common English usage, but for Angeles City there is. — Gavia immer (talk) 03:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is not only the locals that are using Angeles, see Encylopedia Britannica on Angeles (Philippines). I really think that the root argument on the word "city" for Angeles is the same with that of other Philippine cities. --JinJian (talk) 04:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's fine - I disagree with you, and I've said so; that's all. — Gavia immer (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for all cases as proposed, especially Angeles. Adding City appears to be a foreign convention. Please leave redirects from the current X+City names (as is done normally and by default in moves). / edg ☺ ☭ 15:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This request for page move is primarily motivated to drop "city" as part of the article name. Correct me if I am wrong, I believe that you are also in favor of it or at least you are not against it, however, we differ on the way the article title should be disambiguated. If you have read Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines/Task_force_LGU#Article_names_for_Philippine_cities:_.3Ccityname.3E_.3Ccity.3E, I also proposed the format Lucena, Philippines or Angeles, Philippines, however, I have to settle for Lucena (Philippine city) or Angeles (Philippine city) as a compromise. Your opposition may not go toward your cause except that it may be interpreted as in favor of status quo which I think is not your intention. --JinJian (talk) 07:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 5 October 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Nominator withdrew nomination. (non-admin closure) Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Lucena, Philippines → Lucena, Quezon – This page should be moved to a City, State format to match other cities disambiguated in this format. Natg 19 (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lucena, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lucena, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lucena which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lucena,_Philippines&oldid=1166082330"